The Ford Mustang, an iconic American muscle car, boasts varying gas tank sizes across its model years and variations. Let’s dive into the specifics.
The Ford Mustang has a gas tank size of 16 gallons for its 2024 model, including the EcoBoost and GT version.
There aren’t too many muscle cars left, with a big shift towards compact and mid-sized SUV’s. So let’s dive into the world of the Ford Mustang, exploring how its gas tank sizes have evolved over the years.
Gas Tank Capacity by Model Year
- 2024 Models: Current models come with a tank size of 16 gallons, suitable for both the EcoBoost and GT variants.
- 2023 Models: The 2023 Mustang maintained the consistent 16-gallon tank across all its versions, including the Mach 1.
- 2022 Models: The Mustang offered a 15.5-gallon tank for the base models and 16 gallons for the higher-performance variants.
- 2021 Models: The GT and Mach 1 variants of the 2021 Mustang featured a larger 16-gallon tank, while the EcoBoost models had a 15.5-gallon capacity.
- 2020 Models: Higher-end Mustangs boasting a 16-gallon tank and the base models having a 15.5-gallon capacity.
Fuel Tank Size by Year
| Year | Model Variants | Tank Capacity (Gallons) |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | All Models | 16 |
| 2023 | All Models | 16 |
| 2022 | Base Models | 15.5 |
| 2022 | High-Performance Models | 16 |
| 2021 | EcoBoost | 15.5 |
| 2021 | GT, Mach 1 | 16 |
| 2020 | Base Models | 15.5 |
| 2020 | High-Performance Models | 16 |
Fuel Efficiency and Range
- EcoBoost Models (2021-2024): Average 21 MPG city and 32 MPG highway, translating to a range of 325 to 512 miles per tank.
- GT Models (2021-2024): Average 15 MPG city and 24 MPG highway, offering a range of about 240 to 384 miles per tank.
- Mach 1 (2023-2024): Slightly lower efficiency due to performance tuning, averaging around 14 MPG city and 22 MPG highway.
Impact on Driving and Planning
- Long Trips: Larger tanks in the GT and Mach 1 models are beneficial for long trips, reducing the frequency of fuel stops.
- Budgeting: The EcoBoost’s smaller tank and higher efficiency make it more budget-friendly for daily commuting.
- Maintenance: Regular checks on the fuel system are crucial, especially in older models, to maintain efficiency and performance.
Older Models
2010-2019
Throughout the 2010’s, the Ford Mustang maintained a consistent gas tank size of 16 gallons. This consistency reflects Ford’s commitment to balancing fuel capacity with the car’s overall performance and design ethos.
| Year | Model | Tank Capacity (Gallons) |
|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Mustang (Fifth Generation) | 16 |
| 2011 | Mustang (Fifth Generation) | 16 |
| 2012 | Mustang (Fifth Generation) | 16 |
| 2013 | Mustang (Fifth Generation) | 16 |
| 2014 | Mustang (Fifth Generation) | 16 |
| 2015 | Mustang (Sixth Generation) | 16 |
| 2016 | Mustang (Sixth Generation) | 16 |
| 2017 | Mustang (Sixth Generation) | 16 |
| 2018 | Mustang (Sixth Generation) | 16 |
| 2019 | Mustang (Sixth Generation) | 16 |
The sixth-generation Mustang (2015) brought about a significant redesign, with a more aerodynamic look and new technologies.
Despite these comprehensive updates, the gas tank size remained unchanged at 16 gallons.
The 2010’s saw the Mustang continuing to evolve in terms of engine performance, with the introduction of more powerful and efficient engine options, including EcoBoost engines.
2000-2009
In the early 2000’s, the Mustang continued with an increased tank size of 15.7 gallons, a minor change from previous decades.
| Year | Model | Tank Capacity (Gallons) |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | Mustang (All Variants) | 15.7 |
| 2001 | Mustang (All Variants) | 15.7 |
| 2002 | Mustang (All Variants) | 15.7 |
| 2003 | Mustang (All Variants) | 15.7 |
| 2004 | Mustang (All Variants) | 15.7 |
| 2005 | Mustang (Fifth Generation) | 16 |
| 2006 | Mustang (Fifth Generation) | 16 |
| 2007 | Mustang (Fifth Generation) | 16 |
| 2008 | Mustang (Fifth Generation) | 16 |
| 2009 | Mustang (Fifth Generation) | 16 |
A notable change came with the launch of the fifth-generation Mustang in 2005.
This new generation marked a return to the Mustang’s classic design cues, inspired by the models of the 1960’s. Alongside this retro-inspired redesign, the gas tank size was increased to 16 gallons.
This change was a response to the introduction of more powerful engines and desire to maintain a competitive driving range.
The mid-2000’s saw a resurgence in interest in muscle cars, and the Mustang was at the forefront of this revival.
The increased tank size in the fifth-generation models catered to the enhanced performance capabilities and the expected driving habits of Mustang enthusiasts, who valued both power and longer driving ranges.
1990-1999
Throughout the 1990’s, the Ford Mustang maintained a consistent gas tank size of 15.4 gallons across all its variants.
| Year | Model | Tank Capacity (Gallons) |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | Mustang (All Variants) | 15.4 |
| 1991 | Mustang (All Variants) | 15.4 |
| 1992 | Mustang (All Variants) | 15.4 |
| 1993 | Mustang (All Variants) | 15.4 |
| 1994 | Mustang (Fourth Generation) | 15.4 |
| 1995 | Mustang (Fourth Generation) | 15.4 |
| 1996 | Mustang (Fourth Generation) | 15.4 |
| 1997 | Mustang (Fourth Generation) | 15.4 |
| 1998 | Mustang (Fourth Generation) | 15.4 |
| 1999 | Mustang (Fourth Generation) | 15.4 |
The biggest change in the 1990’s was the introduction of the fourth-generation Mustang in 1994.
This new generation brought a complete redesign that was modern and more aerodynamic. Despite these significant changes in styling and technology, the gas tank size remained the same.
The 1990’s saw continued improvements in performance. In particular, the introduction of more powerful engines, like the 4.6-liter V8 in 1996.
Even with these advancements, the 15.4 gallon tank provided a balance between driving range, weight, and size of the vehicle. This balance was important for maintaining the Mustang’s performance characteristics.
1980-1989
The 1980’s represented a continuation of the Ford Mustang’s evolution, with various changes reflecting the era’s automotive trends and technologies.
| Year | Model | Tank Capacity (Gallons) |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | Mustang (All Variants) | 15.4 |
| 1981 | Mustang (All Variants) | 15.4 |
| 1982 | Mustang (All Variants) | 15.4 |
| 1983 | Mustang (All Variants) | 15.4 |
| 1984 | Mustang (All Variants) | 15.4 |
| 1985 | Mustang (All Variants) | 15.4 |
| 1986 | Mustang (All Variants) | 15.4 |
| 1987 | Mustang (All Variants) | 15.4 |
| 1988 | Mustang (All Variants) | 15.4 |
| 1989 | Mustang (All Variants) | 15.4 |
Throughout the 1980’s, the Ford Mustang maintained a consistent gas tank size of 15.4 gallons across all variants.
While the gas tank size remained unchanged, Ford focused on enhancing engine options and introducing fuel injection in several models. These advancements improved fuel economy and power output, making the most of the existing tank capacity.
During this era, the Mustang was available in several different models, including the LX, GT, and the introduction of special editions like the SVO.
Despite these variations, the uniform tank size suggests that Ford prioritized a standardized approach to fuel capacity, ensuring a consistent driving range across all models.
1970-1979
The 1970’s marked a period of significant change for the Ford Mustang, both in terms of design and mechanical specifications. This included modifications to the gas tank sizes, as noted below:
| Year | Model | Tank Capacity (Gallons) |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | Mustang (All Variants) | 16 |
| 1971 | Mustang (All Variants) | 16 |
| 1972 | Mustang (All Variants) | 16 |
| 1973 | Mustang (All Variants) | 16 |
| 1974 | Mustang II (All Variants) | 13 |
| 1975 | Mustang II (All Variants) | 13 |
| 1976 | Mustang II (All Variants) | 13 |
| 1977 | Mustang II (All Variants) | 13 |
| 1978 | Mustang II (All Variants) | 13 |
| 1979 | Mustang (Third Generation) | 15.4 |
During the early part of the decade, the Mustang maintained a consistent 16-gallon tank size. These years followed the trend set in the late 1960’s, focusing more on design and power-train updates rather than changes in fuel capacity.
A major shift occurred in 1974 with the introduction of the Mustang II.
In response to the oil crisis and a growing demand for fuel-efficient vehicles, the Mustang II was significantly smaller and lighter than its predecessors.
This downsizing was accompanied by a reduction in the gas tank size to 13 gallons, reflecting the shift towards improved fuel economy and efficiency in a more compact package.
The year 1979 marked the beginning of the third generation of Mustangs.
With this new generation came a slight increase in the tank size to 15.4 gallons.
This change was part of a broader redesign that aimed to modernize the Mustang while addressing the fuel efficiency and performance needs of the time.
1967-1969
The late 1960’s marked a significant period in the evolution of the Ford Mustang, with notable changes in design, performance, and features, including gas tank sizes.
| Year | Model | Tank Capacity (Gallons) |
|---|---|---|
| 1967 | Mustang (All Models) | 16 |
| 1968 | Mustang (All Models) | 16 |
| 1969 | Mustang (All Models) | 16 |
During these years, Ford maintained a consistent gas tank size of 16 gallons across all Mustang variants.
The late 60’s were more about stylistic and performance changes rather than functional elements like fuel capacity.
V6 vs. V8 Mustang: Fuel Efficiency Comparison
The choice between a V6 and V8 engine in a Ford Mustang significantly impacts its fuel efficiency, driving dynamics, and overall experience. Here’s a closer look:
V6 Engine Models
Known for their balance between power and efficiency, V6 Mustangs generally offer better fuel economy.
For instance, recent V6 models average around 19 MPG in the city and 28 MPG on the highway. This efficiency translates to a longer range per tank, making them a more economical choice for regular commuting and longer drives.
V8 Engine Models
The V8 variants, often seen in GT and Mach 1 models, prioritize performance. With this increase in power comes a decrease in fuel efficiency.
On average, V8 Mustangs get about 15 MPG in urban settings and 24 MPG on highways. While they provide a more thrilling driving experience, their fuel consumption is higher, leading to more frequent stops at the gas station and higher fuel expenses.
Comparative Analysis
When comparing the two, the V6 Mustang is the more fuel-efficient option, offering a blend of performance and economy.
The V8, on the other hand, is tailored for drivers seeking a classic muscle car experience with higher horsepower and torque, albeit at the cost of increased fuel consumption.
This distinction is crucial for prospective buyers, influencing both the driving experience and long-term ownership costs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the Mustang’s tank size affect its performance?
Not significantly. The tank size mainly influences range and fueling frequency.
Are there aftermarket options to increase tank size?
Yes, but modifications should be done professionally to ensure safety and compliance.
How often should I check the fuel system in my Mustang?
It’s advisable to check it during regular maintenance intervals or if you notice any efficiency drops or fuel smells.
Leave a Reply